The reign of terror was it justified

Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Everything is awesome, right?

With the enactment of the law, the number of executions greatly increased, and the period from this time to the Thermidorian Reaction became known as "The Grand Terror". Moreover, the sans-culottes, the scrappy, urban workers of France, agitated leaders to inflict punishments on those who opposed the interests of the poor.

As the French Revolutionary Army notched victory after victory against foreign counter-revolutionary forces, it became harder to justify mass repression. On 17 September, the Law of Suspects was passed, which authorized the imprisonment of vaguely defined "suspects".

Robespierre went crazy and corrupt. This is the list, once again, of the rights that were contrasted by the Terror: Maybe Robespierre finally could not take it in June and July, and finally released his demon-self, leading to HIS execution.

Anti-clerical sentiments increased during and a campaign of dechristianization occurred. Why, the war has ended! Why, the counter-revolutionaries were just crushed one year ago! The radical revolutionaries had overplayed their hand and their fate was sealed.

Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.

My opponent states that the Reign of Terror lead to a democracy. France just came out of having a terrible king who brought the economy into a horrible state, France is facing war on all fronts, France is under threat from internal forces and yet despite all this, the reign of terror kept the Republic alive, won a war against half the world with almost exclusively French forces and fed the once starving peasants, perhaps saving thousands if not millions of lives.

The National Convention was bitterly split between the Montagnards and the Girondins. In conclusion, Robespierre was just as bad as Louis, if not worse. Major events during the Terror[ edit ] This section needs additional citations for verification.

Virtue was the governing idea in peacetime, but it needed to be linked to the implacable use of terror in times of conflict. Therefore the Reign of terror did not lead to authoritarianism as my opponent suggests.

Yet, if anything, Robespierre intensified the terror even more. Following protracted sieges at Lyon and Toulon, thousands of rebels, or suspected rebels, were massacred wholesale.

Terror is nothing more than speedy, severe and inflexible justice; it is thus an emanation of virtue; it is less a principle in itself, than a consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing needs of the patrie [homeland, fatherland] Some historians argue that such terror was a necessary reaction to the circumstances.

Tens of thousands perished. Besides it is very unreasonable to complain about the so called extremeties of the Jacobin government and then take up arms and commit those very same acts except for less than justified reasons.The Reign of Terror, forged in the heat of war, was ultimately undone by it.

As the French Revolutionary Army notched victory after victory against foreign counter-revolutionary forces, it became. Reign Of Terror Reign of Terror is the period of the French revolution since September 5,to July 27 It was a civil and a foreign war, where the. Michael Galifos The Reign of Terror: Was it Justified?

Severed heads, countless corpses and terror in the streets, does the French Revolution sound justified to you?

Several historians consider the "reign of terror" to have begun inplacing the starting date at either 5 September, June or March (birth of the Revolutionary Tribunal), while some consider it to have begun in September (September Massacres), or even July (when the first beheadings by guillotine took place), but there is a.

Full Answer.

The excesses of the nobility in pre-Revolutionary France were a source of enormous frustration for both intellectuals and laborers. It was not a 'Reign of Terror', the attempt at prosecution was justified, the application of justice was lacking and deficient for lack of advances in criminal justice, and it was not something incredibly horrible as the privileged literature of later times depicted.

The reign of terror was it justified
Rated 4/5 based on 35 review