The war powers act of 1973 2 essay

As such it can be seen that the President is bound by laws, amendments and continuing resolutions that place too much weight on the conduct of foreign policy complicated by the participation of military aspect Cockburn, This principle seeks to prevent the over concentration of authority in one person or group of persons that might lead to an error or abuse to the prejudice of the whole state.

Therefore, then President Johnson entered and tried to conduct a full scale and protracted war disguised as a police action. In between these two powers lie a vacuum which the framers of the constitution failed to consider.

An Analysis of the War Powers Act of 1973

The combination of both provides a dangerous whipsaw that can render American foreign policy as ineffective. InPresident Clinton did not consult with Congress either before the bombing campaign in Kosovo. An Analysis of the War Powers Act of One of the hallmarks of a presidential and democratic society is the division of powers among the three main branches of government.

Therefore, Congress created a good but not functional mechanism of the Presidential power limitation that has been disregarded continuously by the Presidents.

This not only led to the death of countless soldiers but it has depleted our resources. However, the fault is not likely coming from a flawed national character or among the attitudes of the leaders but the circumstances that surround it.

It should be added that presidents largely disregarded the efforts of Congress, outlined in the Act NYTtimes. Similar to the Korean War, the United States was also intensely involved in this war without a formal declaration of war by Congress.

Under the said law, the president is required to consult Congress in every possible instance before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations.

On the other hand, under Article II Sec. The act was passed over the veto of the President and apparently it seemed to many as a good idea at that time. It is much truer within the party that is controlling the executive branch.

It is a well meaning constructive criticism that tells the incoherence of policies passed by the executive branch. Consider the Korean War in which the United States army was intensely involved. The same thing happened during the Vietnam War or the Vietnam Conflict. As such, any military troops cannot be introduced anywhere in the world outside the United States unless there is a full report submitted to Congress within forty eight hours.

The War Powers Act of 1973 essay

The Korean War began as a civil war which was fought from — on the Korean Peninsula. Based on these two provisions in the United States Constitution, the war powers appear to be clearly divided between the two main branches of government.

It was convincing without doubt that the conduct of war had been a serious mistake. In fact, the Presidents were aware of this issue and disregarded the Act from time to time.

Under these provisions, the President has the power to lead the armed forces in times of war and to make swift decisions on the field of battle. Various military conflicts involving American military forces did not involve Congress into the decision-making process regarding the actions of the Presidents and their orders.

This makes him as the sole responsible person for leading the military forces. Congressmen created the tool to limit the power of the President but were not able to provide functioning mechanism of making this tool actually work. Arguments against War Powers Act of One of the arguments raised against the enactment of the War Powers Act of is that it is an act of encroachment on the part of the Legislature of a territory which the US Constitution has delegated to the Executive Branch.

The said law also requires the President to terminate within sixty calendar days after a report is submitted any use of United States Armed Forces unless the Congress has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces or has extended by law such sixty-day period or is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States.

This is called the principle of the separation of powers or the principle of checks and balances. The present statute significantly limits the powers of the president to act in times of war which have a serious effect on the performance of his obligation.

Although it was called the Korean War, the United States preferred to call it the police action rather than a war in order to avoid the necessity of formal declaration of war by the Congress of the United States.

In essence, the Congress posses the power to declare war and support the armed forces in this endeavor while the president essays being the Commander in Chief.

After sixty days, this should be terminated unless otherwise, there is an explicit authority from both houses allowing it to continue for another thirty days.War Powers Act essaysThe War Powers Resolution of A Legislative History On November 7th,the 93rd Congress completed the final necessary steps to enact Public Lawthe War Powers Resolution.

Two kinds of War Powers Legislation awaited final action in the Senate and the House in One would establish strict limits on the President's power to take the country into war without specific authorization by Congress, in pursuance of the power to declare war given to the Congress by the Constitution/5(3).

The War Powers Act, also known as the War Powers Resolution ofrequires the following: the President, upon sending troops into military action, must notify Congress within 48 hours that he has done so.

The Resolution also forbids military personnel from remaining in a state of conflict for more than 60 days (including an additional 30 days.

The Influence of the War Powers Act of 1973

The War Powers Act of was a result of drastic response to the American participation in the Vietnam War. The act was passed over the veto of the President and apparently it seemed to many as a good idea at that time.

Essay on The War Powers Act or The War Powers Resolution - The War Powers Act The War Powers Act or sometimes referred to as the War Powers Resolution is passed by congress. A group of Senators led by Jacov K. Javits of New York proposes fundamentally to change the constitutional relationship between President and.

After the war in Vietnam, however, the members of Congress, in an effort to assert their authority to declare war which was granted by the constitution, passed The War Powers Act of over the veto which was exercised by then President Richard Nixon.

Unfortunately, the act failed to settle with finality the conflict between the President and .

The war powers act of 1973 2 essay
Rated 0/5 based on 41 review